Review of the role of the landscape approach in biodiversity conservation

Authors

  • Adugna Babu Department of Natural Resources Management, Bule Hora University, College of Agricultural Sciences, P. O. BOX 144, Ethiopia

Keywords:

Biodiversity Conservation, Landscape ecology, Landscape Structure

Abstract

Achieving global conservation goals requires that realizations, agreements, and directives be customized to reach all levels. In the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity, this means that approaches to conserving biological diversity must be developed at the local landscape level to support the national implementation of the Convention. The main objective of this paper was to review the basic role of landscape in conserving biodiversity. To achieve this goal, different articles and books were referred. As it was reviewed, the three elements of landscape namely corridors, patches, and matrix contribute pivotal roles in the conservation of biodiversity as they facilitate mobility, particularly, for wild animals.  In recent years, protected area management has evolved from a species-based conservation approach to a livelihoods-based landscape approach. A landscape approach to conservation offers significant benefits. It is impractical to plan and implement conservation for all species and their habitat requirements at different landscape scales. Many places around the world are considering how to simultaneously improve local livelihoods, meet national-level development needs, and achieve conservation goals on urgency as current decisions are paving the future pathway for people and biodiversity in landscapes. This is because, landscape approaches seek to provide tools and concepts for allocating and managing land to achieve social, economic, and environmental objectives in areas where agriculture, mining, and other productive land uses compete with environmental and biodiversity goals. Therefore, landscape approaches should gain prominence in the search for solutions to reconcile conservation and development tradeoffs.

References

Ament, R., Callahan, R., McClure, M., Reuling, M., Tabor, G. (2014). Wildlife Connectivity: Fundamentals for conservation action. Center for Large Landscape Conservation, Bozeman, Montana.

Baguette, M, Dyck, H.V. (2007. Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal, Review, Landscape Ecology, 22:1117–1129.

Barnes, T.G. (2000). Landscape Ecology and Ecosystems Management, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky, Collage of Agriculture, UK

Bennett, A.F. (2003). Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.

Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Farvar, M. T., Nguinguiri, J. C. & Ndangang, V.A. (2000). Co-management of Natural Resources: Organizing, Negotiating, and Learning-by-Doing. GTZ and IUCN, Kasparek Verlag, Heidelberg (Germany).

Chandrakar A.K. (2015). Biodiversity conservation in India, M. Phil Environment & Sustainable Development, Central University of Gujarat, UN Decade on Biodiversity, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277124537

Chetkiewicz, C.L.B, Clair, C.C.C, Boyce, M.C. (2006). Corridors for Conservation: Integrating Pattern and Process, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110050

Choowaew, S. (2007). Wetland Functions and Values, Faculty of Environment and Resource Studies Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhonpathom 73170, Thailand.

Cushman S.A, McRae B., Adriaensen F., Beier P, Shirley M and Kathy Zeller K. (2013). Biological corridors and connectivity, Key Topics in Conservation Biology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

DeClerck. F.A.J, Chazdon. R., Holl. K.D, Milder. J.C, Bryan Finegan. B., Salinas. A.M, Pablo Imbach, P., Canet, L., Ramos, Z. (2010). Biodiversity conservation in human-modified landscapes of Mesoamerica: Past, present and future, Biological Conservation.

DeFries, R., Sharma, S, Dutta, T. (2016). A landscape approach to conservation and development in the Central Indian Highlands, Regional Environmental Change, 16 (Suppl 1): S1–S3

Franklin, J. F, Lindenmayer, D.B. (2009). Importance of matrix habitats in maintaining Biological diversity, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, accessed at www.pnas.org.cgi.doi.10.1073.pnas.0812016105

Franklin, J.F. (2018). Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, Or Landscapes? College of Forest Resources AR-IO, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 USA.

Goulart, F.F, Takahashi, F.S.C., Rodrigues, M., Machado, R.B., Filho, B.S. (2015). Where matrix quality most matters? Using connectivity models to assess the effectiveness of matrix conversion in the Atlantic Forest, ht t p: / / w ww.naturezaeconservacao.com.br

Hilty, J.A, William, Z., Lidicker, J.R., Merenlender, .A.M (2006). Corridor Ecology, The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation, Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London.

Jackson, L., Bawa, K., Pascual, U. (2005). Agrobiodiversity: A new Science agenda for biodiversity in support of sustainable agroecosystems. Diversitas Report no. 4, 40 pp.

Johns, A.G. (2004). Biodiversity Conservation through Landscape Ecology: The PARC Approach, Project biodiversity conservation, www.undp.org.vn/projects/parc

Kettunen, M., Terry, A., Tucker, G., Jones, A. (2007). Guidance on the maintenance of landscape features of major importance for wild flora and fauna - Guidance on the implementation of Article 3 of the Birds Directive (79/409/EEC) and Article 10 of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC). Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels, 114 pp. & Annexes.

Kim, K.C, Weaver, R.D. (2009). Biodiversity and Landscapes; a paradox for humanity, Cambridge University Press, www.cambridge.org/9780521119337

Lindenmayer, D.B. (2009). Large-Scale Landscape Experiments, Lessons from Tumut. The Australian National University, Cambridge University Press, www.cambridge.org/9780521881562

Lindenmayer, D.B., Fischer, J. (2006). Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change, An Ecological and Conservation Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London

MacDonald, M.A. (2003). The role of corridors in biodiversity conservation in production forest landscapes: a Literature review, Forestry Tasmania, GPO Box 207, Hobart 7001.

Malanson, G.P. (2002). Riparian landscapes, Cambridge studies in ecology, Cambridge University Press.

Malaysia Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (2009). Managing Biodiversity in the Landscape, Guideline for planners, Decision makers, and practitioners, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, webmaster@nre.gov.my, Putrajaya, Malaysia.

McAlpine, C.A., Seabrook, L.M., Morrison, T.H., Rhodes, J.R. (2013). Strengthening Landscape Ecology’s Contribution to a Sustainable Environment, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia, Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment and Culture.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.

Rosenberg, D.K, Noon, B.R, Meslow, E.C. (1997). Biological Corridors: Form, Function, and Efficacy, American Institute of Biological Sciences.

Sayer J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J.L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., Venter, M., Boedhihartono A.K., Day, M., Claude Garcia, C., Oosten, C.V., Buck., L.E. (2012). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses,Special feature perspective.

Sharma, E., Chettri, N., Gurung, J., Shakya, B. (2007). The Landscape Approach in Biodiversity Conservation, A Regional Cooperation Framework for Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity in the Kangchenjunga Landscape, International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal.

Singh, Y.K. (2006). Environmental Science, New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi – 110002, Visit us at www.newagepublishers.com

Spiesman, B.J., Stapper, A.P., Inouye, B.D. (2018). Patch size, isolation, and matrix effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in a landscape microcosm. Ecosphere 9(3):e02173. 10.1002/ecs2.2173.

Srivastava, R., Tyagi, R. (2016). Wildlife corridors in India: Viable legal tools for species conservation? Senior Programme Officers, Centre for Environmental Law, Worldwide Fund for Nature, Environmental Law Review, 2016, Vol. 18(3) 205–223.

Tulloch, A.T., Barnes, M.D., Ringma, J., Fuller, R.A., Watson J.E.M. (2016). Understanding the importance of small patches of habitat for conservation, Journal of Applied Ecology 2016, 53, 418–429, doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12547.

Walz, U. (2011). Landscape Structure, Landscape Metrics and Biodiversity, Living Rev. Landscape Research, 5(3):1-35.

Wiens J., Moss, M. (2005). Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology, Cambridge Studies in Landscape Ecology, Cambridge university press, www.cambridge.org/9780521830539

Wiens, J.A. (2008). Landscape ecology as a foundation for sustainable Conservation, Landscape Ecol (2009) 24:1053–1065, DOI 10.1007/s10980-008-9284-x, The Nature Conservancy, 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22203, USA.

Wu, J. (2015). Landscape Ecology, School of Life Sciences and Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-18

How to Cite

Babu , A. (2023). Review of the role of the landscape approach in biodiversity conservation. Sustainability and Biodiversity Conservation, 2(1), 61–86. Retrieved from https://sustainable-biodiversity.com/index.php/pub/article/view/17

Issue

Section

Review Articles