Designation of Nauradehi and Veerangana Durgavati wildlife sanctuary as Tiger Reserves in Madhya Pradesh, India: Advancing landscape-level biodiversity conservation

Authors

  • Ritesh Joshi Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi, 110 003, India
  • Kanchan Puri Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14003857

Keywords:

Landscape conservation, Veerangana Durgavati tiger reserve, biodiversity, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

Landscape surrounding and existing within a protected area has a vital role in biodiversity conservation. Landscape conservation facilitates in bringing all the stakeholders on a single platform to collaborate their ideas on managing important biodiversity areas for long-term sustainability. Significant efforts have been made for the management and conservation of biodiversity-rich areas across the larger landscapes. Declaring Nauradehi Wildlife Sanctuary and Veerangana Durgavati Wildlife Sanctuary as Tiger Reserve is noteworthy because they have great ecological and conservation values. The declaration of these sanctuaries as a tiger reserve shall strengthen the landscape management approach, facilitate the population of tigers to move across a large landscape, and establish their wider territories for gene flow. It is also important to document and observe in the next few years, how the tigers adapt and how the development of the area would help the locals without affecting conservation.

References

Bhattacharya, A., & Habib, B. (2016). Highest elevation record of tiger presence from India. CATnews, 64, 24–25.

Bilal, H., Krishnamurthy, R., & Gopal, R. (2017). Technical guidelines for habitat, prey, and tiger recovery across tiger range countries (Technical Report No. 2017/004). Wildlife Institute of India & Global Tiger Forum. https://globaltigerforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Tiger-habitat-recovery.pdf

Biodiversity Conservation and Rural Livelihood Improvement Project (BCRLIP). (2018). https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/project-detail/P088520

Brennan, A., Naidoo, R., Greenstreet, L., Mehrabi, Z., Ramankutty, N., & Kremen, C. (2022). Functional connectivity of the world's protected areas. Science, 376(6597), 1101–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl8974

Chandra, K., Pandey, R., Bhandari, R., & Sambath, S. (2013). Diversity of hawk moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) in Veerangana Durgavati Wildlife Sanctuary, Damoh, Madhya Pradesh. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 5(1), 73–77.

DeFries, R., Parashar, S., Neelakantan, A., Clark, B., & Krishnaswamy, J. (2023). Landscape connectivity for wildlife and water: The state of the literature. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 8, 149–158.

Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services (p. 1148). Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673

NITI Aayog & UNDP. (2012). Human development report Bundhelkhand. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/in/ddc2f6b9fe1fa9264eb1ce29cd6c16044624c79125802f44c76e5e31f9c17da7.pdf

Heller, N. E., & Zavaleta, E. S. (2009). Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation, 142(1), 14–32.

Kleijn, D., Biesmeijer, K. J. C., Klaassen, R. H. G., Oerlemans, N., Raemakers, I., Scheper, J., & Vet, L. E. M. (2020). Integrating biodiversity conservation in wider landscape management: Necessity, implementation, and evaluation. In The future of agricultural landscapes, Part I (Advances in Ecological Research, pp. 127–159). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.08.004

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC). (2021). S.O.4617(E) Final Notification declaring Eco Sensitive Zone around Veerangana Durgawati WLS, Madhya Pradesh. https://moef.gov.in/uploads/2020/08/veerangana-durgawati-1.pdf

Parveen, T., & Ilyas, O. (2021). The inter-linking of rivers and biodiversity conservation: A study of Panna Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. Current Science, 121(12), 1572–1583.

Patel, J. K., & Anuragi, R. B. (2023). Identifying the ecotourism potential locations using AHP and weighted overlay analysis: A case of Bundelkhand region in Central India. Papers in Applied Geography, 10(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2023.2254786

Pawar, D., Chanchani, P., Kanwar, A., Sylvia, C., Salaria, S., Gopal, R., Kapoor, M., Solanki, R., Bopanna, I. P., Singh, A. K., Anirudh, N. B., Bakshi, S., & Jasrotia, T. (2020). Photographic evidence of tiger from Kedarnath Musk Deer Sanctuary, India. CATnews, 71, 18–19.

Rasaily, S. S. (2012). Management plan of Rajaji National Park (2012–2013 to 2021–2022). Uttarakhand Forest Department, Dehradun.

Tiwari, S. K. (2003). Solomon’s saga of a wildlife sanctuary: Veerangana Durgavati Abhayaranya. Sarup & Sons.

Vaidyanathan, G. (2019). India's tigers seem to be a massive success story — many scientists aren't sure. Nature, 574(7780), 612–616.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-10

How to Cite

Ritesh Joshi, & Kanchan Puri. (2024). Designation of Nauradehi and Veerangana Durgavati wildlife sanctuary as Tiger Reserves in Madhya Pradesh, India: Advancing landscape-level biodiversity conservation. Sustainability and Biodiversity Conservation, 3(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14003857