The Awareness and acceptance of genetic modification technology and germplasm for trees and agricultural crops in Uganda

Authors

  • Priscilla Nyadoi Uganda Martyrs University
  • Gilbert Tayebwa International Crane Foundation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22099383

Keywords:

Biosafety protocols , Disease resistance , Environmental degradation, Harmful chemicals , Transgenics

Abstract

Uganda is yet to put in place the legal framework to enable the application of genetic modification technology (GM) and promotion of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In this study, we explored farmers’ level of awareness and acceptance of GM technology and GMOs; we in particular focused on such for trees and agricultural crops germplasm. Results of analysis of data obtained from 158 randomly selected respondents in different districts from the North, South, East and Western Uganda show that majority (75.9%) knew what GM technology and GMOs were, 89 (56.3%) said they would accept GM technology application for trees and agricultural crops germplasm development and, 47.4% believed the technology would lead to better yields and 35.8% mentioned quick income would be realised from GM crops. Respondents who do not accept the technology perceive it to be expensive, produce tasteless crops and products shunned in the market, reduce genetic variation, and compete with indigenous species among other reasons.  Overall, our findings give evidence of the readiness among farmers for the GM technology. Uganda thus needs to complete the pending policy and legal framework to enable application and research, especially focused on crop maturity time reduction and yield improvement for income enhancement. We recommend that the Parliament of Uganda enact legislation and the Executive assent to laws that will enable the application of GM technology and adoption of GMOs in agricultural production in Uganda.

References

Bekele-Alemu, A., Dessalegn-Hora, O., Safawo-Jarso, T., and Ligaba-Osena, A. (2025). Rethinking progress: harmonizing the discourse on genetically modified crops. Front. Plant Sci. 16: 1547928. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1547928.

Bennett, K., and Allen, P. (2012). SPSS Statistics: A Practical Guide Version 20. Cengage Learning Australia.

Bigirwa, G. (2005). Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Capacity Survey Uganda. FAO.

Dolapo, A. O., Onyeaka, H., Ekwueme, C. T., Njoagwuani, E. I., Ayomikun, O. O., Ngene, C. E., Olatunji, C. A., Oladunjoye, I., Michael, I. M., Akegbe, H., Tamasiga, P., and Ghosh, S. (2025). Evaluating Consumer Perceptions and Safety of Genetically Modified Foods in Africa: A Comprehensive Review. Food Science & Nutrition, 13(6), e4730. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.4730

Gbashi, S., Adebo, O., Adebiyi, A.J., Targuma, S., Tebele, S., Areo, M.O., Olopade, B., Odukoya,O.J., and Njobeh, P. (2021). Food safety, food security and genetically modified organisms in Africa: a current perspective, Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 37:1, 30-63, DOI:10.1080/02648725.2021.1940735

https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2021.1940735

Giannakas, K., and Fulton, M. (2000). Consumption effects of Genetic Modifications: What if consumers are right? EPTD Discussion Paper No. 69. Food Policy Research Institute, USA.

Hadley, J.M., Tanz, S.J., and Fraser, J. (2001). Biotechnology: Potential Applications in Tree Improvement. FGG Extension note 02. Canada.

Hobbs, B, J.E., and Plunkett, M. D. (1999). Genetically modified foods: Consumer Issues and the Role of Information Asymmetry? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics.

Kikulwe, E. M., and Asindu, M. (2020). A contingent valuation analysis for assessing the market for genetically modified planting materials among banana producing households in Uganda. GM Crops & Food, 11(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2020.1720498

Lanre, A.G., Ayeni, A.E., Tettey, K.C., Uyanga, A.V., Aluko, O.O., Ahiakpa, K.J., Okoye, O.C., Mbadianya, I.J., Adekoya, A.M., Aminu, O.R., Oyawole, P.F., and Odufuwa, P. (2022). GMOs in Africa: Status, adoption and public acceptance, Food Control, Volume 141,2022,109193, ISSN 0956-7135,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109193.

(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713522003863).

Lukanda, I. N. (2020). Activists as strategic science communicators on the adoption of GMOs in Uganda. JCOM 19(06), C06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.19060306

Mmbando S, G. (2024) The Adoption of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: The Public’s Current Perception, the Regulatory Obstacles, and Ethical Challenges, GM Crops & Food, 15:1, 185-199, DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2345401. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2024.2345401

Mwanga, C., and Turyamureeba, R. (2025). Overcoming Biases: Unlocking the Potential of Genetically Modified Crops to Transform Agriculture in Uganda. East African Journal of Health and Science, 8(1), 292-304. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajhs.8.1.2853

Nyadoi, P., Ogola, L., Kyakyo, H., and Okullo, J, B, L. (2020). Elucidating Environment Management Intervention Benefits and Underpinning Factors among Uganda’s Albertine Rift Communities. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 8, 157-174. doi: 10.4236/gep.2020.810012.

Plunkett, M, D., and Gaisford, D. J. (2000). “Limiting biotechnology? Information problems and policy responses.” Current Agriculture, Food & Resource Issues 1/2000:21-28.

Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (UNCST), (2009). The role of biotechnology in Forestry research, development and conservation. Report of the Ninth Open Forum on Agricultural Biotechnology in Africa (OFAB) – Uganda Chapter.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-03

How to Cite

Nyadoi, P., & Tayebwa, G. (2026). The Awareness and acceptance of genetic modification technology and germplasm for trees and agricultural crops in Uganda . Sustainability and Biodiversity Conservation, 5(2), 69–98. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22099383